<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.resonant.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Resonant Information - Technology - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.resonant.org/technology</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Technology&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Lens cap</title>
 <link>http://www.resonant.org/node/488#comment-7646</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Logitech Quickcam pro 5000 has a flip-over lens cap, one of the reasons I purchased it. Not sure about the others though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:30:01 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7646 at http://www.resonant.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Interesting</title>
 <link>http://www.resonant.org/20050904-first-user-review-of-canon-ef-24-105-f4#comment-457</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:54:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 457 at http://www.resonant.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A comparative test</title>
 <link>http://www.resonant.org/20050904-first-user-review-of-canon-ef-24-105-f4#comment-456</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Comparison of a Canon EF 24-105/4.0 L IS USM versus a EF 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM and a EF 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS USM shot at different focal length and at different f-stops using a Canon EOS 10D set at ISO 100&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acapixus.dk/photography/24_to_105/index.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.acapixus.dk/photography/24_to_105/index.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:56:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 456 at http://www.resonant.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The iSight is a good start...</title>
 <link>http://www.resonant.org/node/488#comment-70</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;... and I thank you both for bringing it to my attention, but what about the rest?  This really should be a standard feature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nonetheless, I&#039;ll update the entry.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:10:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 70 at http://www.resonant.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lens Caps</title>
 <link>http://www.resonant.org/node/488#comment-69</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The iSight has a built-in shutter in front of the lens that is manually controlled. When closed it is white and stands out so that you know it is in place.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:47:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 69 at http://www.resonant.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>They do come with caps!</title>
 <link>http://www.resonant.org/node/488#comment-68</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Apple&#039;s iSight has a iris over the lens - twist the top, and it closes the lens!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:00:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 68 at http://www.resonant.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Interview with a Link Spammer</title>
 <link>http://www.resonant.org/20050124-referrer-spam#comment-10</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register&lt;/a&gt; is running an article containing an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/31/link_spamer_interview/&quot;&gt;interview with a link spammer&lt;/a&gt;.  They kindly make this person anonymous, and imply that there&#039;s really only 8 or so of them responsible for all this grief.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So...  do we have anyone willing to get into the business long enough to identify these guys?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:20:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10 at http://www.resonant.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
